JX-1 77/22®, 96/22™ 10-Round Magazine

JX-1 77/22®, 96/22™ 10-Round Magazine
Item Number: 90057
 Review Average:  
 Number of Reviews: 5
 View ReviewsReview this item
In Stock

Detailed Description

10-round bolt-action .22 LR caliber magazine with Steel Feed - Black Plastic *Due to changes in the law effective October 1, 2013 Ruger is not able to sell magazines to CONNECTICUT residents. Ruger cannot bill to or ship this magazine to Brooklyn, Buffalo, New York City, or Rochester, New York. DO NOT ORDER THIS PRODUCT if you live in these cities.
Genuine Ruger® Factory Accessory

WARNING: Discharging firearms in poorly ventilated areas, cleaning firearms, or handling ammunition may result in exposure to lead and other substances known to the State of California to cause birth defects, reproductive harm, and other serious physical injury. Have adequate ventilation at all times. Wash hands thoroughly after exposure.

 Product ReviewsClick here to review this item
No problems 2/10/2017
Having both an early 77/22 made in 84 and a newer K77/22 made in 08, Ive experienced no problems whatsoever using these magazines in either rifle.
- Bob, NY
No Problemo 12/15/2014
I have a 1986 version of the 77/22 and these magazines fit flush with the bottom of the receiver and can be inserted and ejected as designed with no fumbling. I can easily load 10 rounds of .22 LR into these as well and they function perfectly. Build quality is very good, the same as it has always been in my experience with Ruger factory mags. I have no negative issues to report.
- Den Bob, OH
Satisfied customer. 9/3/2014
Ive had no trouble with this item. Works well and easy load and pack. I have two or three loaded in my pocket when Im in the woods. My grandsons are learning on this system and have no problems. Good job Ruger! MADE IN AMERICA!
Terrill Parrish
JX-1Magazine 8/28/2014
I agree with the previous poster, this magazine is too wide. Poor fit quality
JX-1 6/28/2014
Very poor quality. .030 or approx. 1/32 too wide. You find this out after youve opened the packages. Deserves a minus + minus rating.